From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de>
Subject: Re: Multiple :LOGBOOK: blocks "allowed" without unwanted side
 effects?
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:11:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4F68AC39.4080609@online.de>
References: <jk9hdh$gpe$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<loom.20120320T104829-875@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49321)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1SA1fC-0006v3-5o
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:12:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1SA1f7-0003bF-9R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:11:57 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50904)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1SA1f7-0003b5-2Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:11:53 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1SA1f5-0005di-Gz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:11:51 +0100
Received: from 212.34.176.74 ([212.34.176.74])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:11:51 +0100
Received: from rainer.stengele by 212.34.176.74 with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:11:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120320T104829-875@post.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Am 20.03.2012 10:52, schrieb Achim Gratz:
> Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele <at> online.de> writes:
>> I want to be sure that multiple :LOBGOOK: blocks in sequence are making no
> trouble.
> 
> I don't know about having multiple LOGBOOK drawers, that feels dirty...  What I
> do is having a CLOSED drawer defined, putting it directly behind the LOGBOOK
> drawer and then just shift the boundary between the two (the two lines
> :END:\n:CLOSED:\n) whenever I feel like it (at the end of the week, mainly).
> 
> :LOGBOOK:
> ....whatever
> :END:
> :CLOSED:
> ....whatever else
> :END:
> 
> Achim.
> 
> 
> 

I wonder if any of the clocking table functions is looking at the drawer names or begin end markers or
is simply collecting all CLOCK entries, which would say that the "management/hiding" of the
CLOCK entries by drawer names is no problem.

Rainer