From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vikas Rawal Subject: Re: visual-fill-column-mode with org Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:04:14 +0530 Message-ID: <4D836C93-D1A8-4239-BC21-AB7F32C0DBBD@agrarianresearch.org> References: <7D8B6210-AA4A-4B1A-B559-C1D8E3C771AD@agrarianresearch.org> <87egg0zsw8.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPB1-0001sC-FB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:34:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPAw-0001yl-E7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:34:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:36798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvPAw-0001y4-54 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:34:26 -0500 Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so145577371pac.3 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 04:34:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87egg0zsw8.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus , org-mode mailing list >=20 >> I would like to use visual-fill-column-mode with my org >> files. However, this has a peculiar problem that org tables also = start >> wrapping at fill-column. Does anyone use visual-fill-column-mode with >> org and has found a way of telling it to ignore lines starting with a >> |? >=20 > Hardly a solution, but you can force columns to only be a certain = width > with the declaration, where n is an integer. >=20 Reducing width of the table to fill-column is hardly usable. It will not = work if I zoom in. Also, I will have to keep doing this for every table. Everything will = get more complicated if the table is result of a babel code block. No.. Vikas