From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Hagmann?= Subject: latex export problem Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:55:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA4A4CF.6060305@unibas.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57661 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1KXe-0005yT-3Z for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:55:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1KXX-0006pR-GF for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:55:25 -0400 Received: from smtp1pub.unibas.ch ([131.152.227.80]:7781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1KXX-0006o8-B5 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:55:19 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear list, I have an org file named "test.org" structured as follows (minimal example): ------minimal example------------ * Head text * Second head :PROPERTIES: :EXPORT_OPTIONS: H:5 num:nil toc:t \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:{} -:t f:t *:t skip:nil d:nil tags:nil :EXPORT_TITLE: My Title :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: scripts/filename :END: #+begin_src latex \input gentium-ge #+end_src ** section text ------end of minimal example----------- I export the second head to a filename.tex file in a subdirectory (and convert it later to ConTeXt code, but that shouldn't matter here). I swear that this worked -- I have everything pertaining to my lectures in this file. However, it stopped working recently (without updating org-mode). All I get when I export "Second Head" to latex is: "No such file: /Users/me/test.org" The cause is the #+begin_src ... #+end_src block Did I inadvertently change some parameter? Or is it a bug (less likely)? Thanks for your suggestions, Jörg