From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sF1ZOTy5gF+OSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 19:25:48 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UOgeNTy5gF+aKwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 19:25:48 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BBD39402A2 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 19:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQy1R-0004xN-7R for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:25:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQy0P-0004xC-VU for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:24:42 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQy0N-0001HM-MR for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:24:41 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CC12400FC for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:24:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1602271476; bh=2igh0hZa9vlSPhe1+bl1z03c1qUkwZNdIXKJHYi9fy0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=HySzXoh7G4idWp90RDyhsX2gHOU+sfa6Q2BCUc+ag20xQV4bFSCplz47OvYnmCqu/ m+janBfRk22g+ldhGGkd+nQlAyjO2wmUPbvgGYlKpGNpWfvmlOEy3AWhmRX5HXmY9z QIG52lM6L9O676/K83o3k4DNRCPZ+P2IwihfAD/jU+YsVvvew9BjaBtNPYl7cZG9se rNjF2ZbUfKTcLMGE+jLYUZ9xAk1MuLRlNQGfEZn6zSlrZGOpxvTRZqUQ6+4cAaq74Y EvoINB4kDuEIdEBQ4ufw36DjG4XETHZ1S7qKVtrHZBrNI/FHfJ6rZfhS6l62q4Ojfd ree63Eu7eQF+A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4C7J0z5Rknz6tmG for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:24:34 +0200 From: To: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Reply-All noise X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4C7J0z6zLHz6tmH@submission01.posteo.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=c.buhtz@posteo.jp; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/09 12:40:08 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.jp header.s=2017 header.b=HySzXoh7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.jp; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: tm18E67yfgJc Hi, I had this discussion in several mailinglists but gave up. But I am suprised to see this phenomenon in a emacs related (means: "super nerdy") mailinglist, too. So tell me please how do you handle this "problem"? Or do I setup something wrong with my list account? =46rom my point of view, the problem is that most of you press "Reply All" when answering to a mailinglist posting. But that is IMO wrong because you answer to the list AND to the thread opener in that case. So the thread opener receive two (nearly) identical messages. Do you receive double mails? Doesn't it bother you?