From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk>
Subject: Re: list format questions
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:07:50 +0000
Message-ID: <474708E6.806@calicojack.co.uk>
References: <b71b18520711070932h13dbe213qf2da882c1250c2f2@mail.gmail.com>	<87sl2xz8hh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<b71b18520711230740p3e3edcd4i4a3487dcf80e4bdf@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ivc4c-0005bc-0S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:12:14 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ivc4Z-0005Wg-VF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:12:13 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ivc4Z-0005WM-QD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:12:11 -0500
Received: from storm.bpweb.net ([83.223.106.8])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rick@calicojack.co.uk>) id 1Ivc4Z-0006xO-CQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:12:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <b71b18520711230740p3e3edcd4i4a3487dcf80e4bdf@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eddward DeVilla <eddward@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>>
>> ,----
>> |   - [ ] Q2 is a really, really, long Q and needs to be described in
>> |         excruciating detail.
>> `----
>>
>> Which might be seen as more natural.  But it's not obvious for me.  Do
>> you think auto-refill should wrap the line like in the second example?
>>
>> (I'm not speaking about explicit refilling with `M-q' here.)
> 
> Personally, I prefer the second example where the text aligns with
> text instead of the checkbox.  

I also much prefer the text aligning with the text not the checkbox.  In 
fact I always seem to end up inserting a tab on the second line to force 
the alignment with M-q from then on.

Any way to guarantee this behavior would be an improvement in my eyes.


R.