From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William Henney" Subject: Re: minor niggles concerning tables Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:42:15 -0500 Message-ID: <41c818190706041342q58956dafn5aad7cce74a08040@mail.gmail.com> References: <41c818190706040905s2c44d931r1321ffa03773839e@mail.gmail.com> <6f8ba0aeecc32dbd3810e9f70818e04f@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvJNb-00035Q-On for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:42:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvJNZ-000330-Vc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:42:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvJNZ-00032Z-Nk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:42:17 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvJNZ-0001kH-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:42:17 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so321073ana for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:42:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6f8ba0aeecc32dbd3810e9f70818e04f@science.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > In fact, org-table-eval-formula understands both kinds of references. > Yes, of course, silly me! > Yes, I agree, this is hard and a bit unfortunate. If I could > start from scratch, I would make but the same, but for backward > compatibility I cannot. Understood. > The right setting of this variable is important in particular for the > formula editor (C-c '). Have you ever tried it? > No. Thanks for the pointer. > > ** numbers like "1.e3" > > I am in the (lazy) habit of omitting the zero after the decimal > > point in scientific notation. This causes no problems in most > > programming languages, or for calc.el, but it is misinterpreted in > > table formulae. Is it possible to easily fix this? > > Interesting bug! Fixed as well, thank you very much. > Great. Cheers Will --=20 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia