From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Custom agenda question Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:08:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3D1B7772-DE95-4B98-90E9-A975DF644325@gmail.com> References: <8BDFAE1E-5B8A-41C5-BA79-15D5E068EF1B@gmail.com> <9E989035-306A-4A27-B8AB-37CAC5D09D4A@gmail.com> <87fxbebx2b.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> <60005D51-BAB7-4F57-9794-FA170B8739EE@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mga1o-00048Q-EI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:08:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mga1h-00047K-GR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:08:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35160 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mga1h-00047H-B1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:08:09 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:19506) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mga1g-00065q-Ov for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:08:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com ([209.85.219.217]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mga1g-00061H-7E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:08:08 -0400 Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so336492ewy.2 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:08:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Phil Rooke Cc: org-mode Mailinglist On Aug 26, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Phil Rooke wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Daniel Clemente wrote: >> >>> I saw something strange: Emacs seems to beep with each C-n on that >>> view. Not with C-p. >>> >>> The following (ding) is being run on next-line due to the condition >>> end-of-buffer, I don't know why: >>> >>> (if (interactive-p) >>> (condition-case nil >>> (line-move arg nil nil try-vscroll) >>> ((beginning-of-buffer end-of-buffer) (ding))) >>> (line-move arg nil nil try-vscroll))) >>> nil) >>> >>> The call was: >>> (line-move 1 nil nil 1) >> >> Interesting. But I cannot reproduce it. > > I too am having the exact same (minor) problem as Daniel. > Additionally, > in the 'E' expanded view the 'p' command will move to the end of the > line containing the previous agenda entry as opposed to hugging the > leftmost column as it does in the non-expanded view. I cannot believe it, there really *are* people who use Emacs and accept the new line-move-visual default value????? This drives me sooo crazy when editing code and other line-organized content - which, frankly, is *all* the stuff I do edit in Emacs. The absolute first line in my .emacs file is (setq line-move-visual nil) Anyway, I am now overruling this for the agenda, to get rid of the beep for now. I guess this should count as an Emacs bug, though. - Carsten