From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:40:02 -0500 Message-ID: <28368.1292600402@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40464 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTcPp-0001QG-9I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:40:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTcPo-00077y-8z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:40:17 -0500 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:62295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTcPo-00077s-5r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:40:16 -0500 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LDK00M4QWUQG370@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:40:03 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:52:42 +0900." <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Torsten Wagner Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Torsten Wagner wrote: > Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use > [Orgmode] since all mails coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is > a strong indicator already. At least for me, the subject appears in my mail-reading pane so I can see the tag, but the sender that appears is the original sender (e.g. Torsten Wagner), not emacs-orgmode. I'd have to look *in* the mail to find the latter. Nick