Re: [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

[Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>]

Hi Richard,

I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what circumstances  
does this fail?

- Carsten

On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

> See attached simple patch.
>
> From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Richard Klinda <rklinda@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:03:39 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)
>
> ---
> lisp/org-clock.el |    4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
> index 56dbab5..87017fc 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-clock.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
> @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.")
>       (org-fit-window-to-buffer)
>       (message (or prompt "Select task for clocking:"))
>       (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
> +      (when (featurep 'xemacs)
> +        ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead  
> of
> +        ;; ascii value
> +        (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
>       (cond
>        ((eq rpl ?q) nil)
>        ((eq rpl ?x) nil)
> -- 
> 1.6.2.1
>
>
> -- 
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

- Carsten