From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: Continuation of main section text after subsections ? Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:45:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20408.1301244331@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <20110327170251.58923564@hsdev.com> <81tyeotvzo.fsf@gmail.com> <20110327181155.054fecf2@hsdev.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48522 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3t68-0007z9-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:45:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3t66-0004rs-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:45:51 -0400 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]:41965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3t66-0004rZ-Or for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:45:50 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LIQ00HS76JVHO80@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:45:37 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Marcel van der Boom of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:11:55 +0200." <20110327181155.054fecf2@hsdev.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Marcel van der Boom Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Marcel van der Boom wrote: > When writing I tend to think about org headings as 'handles' to a > logical block of information, including its child blocks. Apparently my > analogy clashes with what org-mode wants. I had my hopes on a > customization option. > > Is there a strong reason this could not work as an option in org-mode? > I'm sure that patches would be welcome, but I think you'd find it difficult to specify, let alone implement. In particular, how do you tell where the section 1.1.1 stuff ends and the section 1 stuff begins again? And would the extra stuff be part of section 1 or (sub)section 1.1? Why? And don't forget this is all just text, so any markup has to be minimal, intuitive and as unobtrusive as possible. The devil is in the details. Nick