From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mycroft Jones <mycroft@reactor-core.org>
Subject: Re: orgmode for many continuous tasks?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:04:42 -0700
Message-ID: <20171003230442.GA25@reactor-core.org>
References: <20170925072151.GA18049@reactor-core.org>
	<87mv5f209w.fsf@bobnewell.net> <87h8vncr1b.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33670)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mycroft@reactor-core.org>) id 1dzWF7-0000oH-AG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:04:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mycroft@reactor-core.org>) id 1dzWF4-0007sB-3j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:04:49 -0400
Received: from reactor-core.org ([174.136.106.90]:34446)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mycroft@reactor-core.org>)
	id 1dzWF3-0007qs-QN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:04:46 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87h8vncr1b.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Bob Newell <bobnewell@bobnewell.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:48:16AM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>On Wednesday, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:24, Bob Newell wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> To further the concept: If TODOs had due dates/time estimates/time spent
>> as perhaps additional properties, and there was a better way to express
>> dependencies (I think there is already an org-mode adjunct for this),
>> some coding could turn this into a Task Juggler input file.
>
>There is ox-taskjuggler in org-contrib...

How do I learn about org-contrib and how to use it?

Mycroft