From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:38:36 +0200
Message-ID: <20130522173836.GA68001@kenny.local>
References: <87wqqusder.fsf@pank.eu> <87ip2esccc.fsf@pank.eu>
	<20130521165658.GA56408@client199-78.wlan.hu-berlin.de>
	<87zjvo9qwy.fsf@pank.eu> <20130521200650.GB58739@kenny.local>
	<87zjvo7xkl.fsf@pank.eu> <20130522145312.GB61443@kenny.local>
	<8761yb7x60.fsf@pank.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53032)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@gmail.com>) id 1UfD54-0005y9-1x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 13:44:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@gmail.com>) id 1UfD4y-0000FI-Fy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 13:44:06 -0400
Received: from mail-bk0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::230]:53469)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@gmail.com>) id 1UfD4y-0000Eq-9q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 13:44:00 -0400
Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id jf3so1271259bkc.7
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8761yb7x60.fsf@pank.eu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

Rasmus wrote:

> Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> Ah, you mean the textsc?  Perhaps it is a bit eccentric.  But you're
> >> bringing up a good point.  It should recognize [p]+s and perhaps even
> >> order them. . .
> >
> > If there is no PS prefix set, users could simply write these out
> > themselves. I don't think it is much of a burden. Recognizing multiple
> > :P[+]S: tags in code seems like overkill to me. The all go into the same
> > \ps, don't they?
> 
> No, you'd want have
> \ps{ps:one}
> \ps{pps:two}
> \ps{pps:three}.

Okay, I didn't know this. But what's the advantage over

\ps{
ps:one

ps:two

ps:three}
 
> > The latter example does not really work for me because I often write
> > letters below a TODO headline (as opposed to a dedicated file). So I
> > restrict export to a subtree which would not work if I'm below the
> > letter headline. In my case I would use something like this:
> >
> > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> > * TODO write letter
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :EXPORT_OPENING: ...
> > ...
> > :END:
> >
> > The letter goes here.
> >
> > ** TO :TO:
> > ...
> > #+END_EXAMPLE
> > I have a capture template setup for letters, so I don't normally have to
> > add the address information manually. I would probably stick to the old
> > format and use headlines if I have a PS and so on.
> 
> Cool, you should write an article about!

Do you mean the capture template? I might put it in the tutorial. I
planned to have a tips and tricks section there anyway.

Cheers,
Viktor

> 
> -- 
> Don't panic!!!
>