From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vikas Rawal Subject: Emacs starter kit Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:17:07 +0530 Message-ID: <20120716134707.GA9985@panahar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqlfy-0006DR-I3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:49:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqlfs-0000N7-FN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:49:26 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:40057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqlfs-0000N0-B8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:49:20 -0400 Received: by ghrr18 with SMTP id r18so5794454ghr.0 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode There are multiple versions of Emacs Starter Kit. The two main versions that I currently see are one maintained by Eric Schulte (http://eschulte.me/emacs24-starter-kit/) and the other maintained by Phil Hagelberg (https://github.com/technomancy/emacs-starter-kit/). The important difference between the two is that Eric Schulte's version is a collection of org-mode files from where the .el files are generated. The startup options are maintained as org documents. Package.el, and ELPA, are a part of the starter kit in this case. The starter kit installs the packages. In Hagelberg's version, this is inverted. Starter kit is installed by the package manager that is now a part of Emacs (version 24). The package manager directly installs a bunch of .el files and there are no org files to see. Which is the recommended way to go? What is the experience of people on this list? (This mail perhaps belongs to the emacs mailing list, but since at least one of these versions is based on using org-mode to manage emacs, people on this mailing list will perhaps have some interest in the issue.). Vikas