From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: LaTeX-export to ACM SIG Proceedings format Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:14:11 +0200 Message-ID: <2012-04-25T00-12-21@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2012-04-24T22-00-37@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMo0B-0001rx-Av for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:14:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMo08-0002qI-ST for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:14:26 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMo08-0002oJ-Kw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:14:24 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMo07-0003hf-3M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:14:23 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:14:23 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:14:23 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Karl Voit writes: > >> Maybe it might be a cool idea to work on this template together and >> publish it on Worg? I can imagine that several people are trying to >> meet those ACM template requirements ... > > This seems like a good idea. Would it be possible to target Nicolas > Goaziou's experimental LaTeX exporter, instead of the old exporter? Since I was using the PDF/LaTeX export just to make quick and dirty files to send other people or pretty print, I was not aware that there is another LaTeX exporter. What would be the consequence of choosing the new one? -- Karl Voit