Re: Is it possible to markup one character in a word?

[Vladimir Lomov <lomov.vl@gmail.com>]

Hello,
** John Hendy [2011-08-25 07:06:54 -0500]:

> This seems incredibly similar to a thread that *just* took place. Take
> a look at this:
> --- http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg45883.html

Thanks, I read it.

> Any help there?

Actually not much, this was example from a table (see below).

Some time ago I tried to markup a word in source block and
found that it is impossible now.
I simply insert a html-aware text between #+{begin,end}_html and that work
but this is suboptimal even if I only want to get html after export.

So, is it easy to support in markup parse code the ZERO WIDTH SPACE?

I found about ZWS here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapping_of_Unicode_characters#Word_joiners_and_separators

> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Vladimir Lomov <lomov.vl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi.

>> Is it possible to markup one character in a word, like e*X*ecute. For
>> now this don't work. I tried to add ZERO WIDTH SPACE (found on mailing
>> list) before first * and last * like in example e*X*ecute but this
>> don't work also.

*** Example

Imagine following example:

| Key bind   | Action                        |
|------------+-------------------------------|
|            | <29>                          |
|            | *Launch a program* (e*x*ecute) |
| W-x t      | launch terminal emulator rxvt-unicode (connect urxvtc client to running urxvt server which should be already started) |
|            | *Launch a browser* (*b*rowser) |
| W-b f      | launch =firefox=           |
... etc

---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov

-- 
It has been observed that one's nose is never so happy as when it is
thrust into the affairs of another, from which some physiologists have
drawn the inference that the nose is devoid of the sense of smell.
		-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"