From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] (solved) noweb does not work (as expected)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:02:21 +0900
Message-ID: <200911101202.21164.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com>
References: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N7h04-0007j5-5a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:32 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N7gzz-0007dr-Pf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:31 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7gzz-0007de-HP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:27 -0500
Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:56211)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <torsten.wagner@gmail.com>) id 1N7gzz-0008Au-0j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:27 -0500
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so5222029ewy.42
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:02:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Org Mode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi,

finally I found the problem. As Dan mentioned there is a difference for 
<<block1>>
<<block1()>>
<<block1(a=1)>>

For some reason I was sticking with block1() and override it over and over 
again. No it seems to work go into the right direction. Python still seems not 
to like the code if its created by :noweb. However :tangle code seems to run 
fine.

I will try to sort this out now.

By the way, :noweb and :tangle seems to work nicely together which gives the 
freedom to go one or the other way to execute the source code blocks

During fiddling around the last day, I found some quirks and "nice to have" 
requests. Should I simply post them on the list ?

Thanks again for helping me

Torsten