From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hsiu-Khuern Tang Subject: Sorting a column of inactive dates Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:06:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20090203000630.GX28304@hplhtang1> Reply-To: Hsiu-Khuern Tang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU8pu-0007Rn-T9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:08:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU8pt-0007RR-EG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:08:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46644 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU8pt-0007RO-AF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:08:17 -0500 Received: from madara.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:60823) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LU8ps-0007l7-Rn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:08:17 -0500 Received: from masterns.hpl.hp.com (masterns.hpl.hp.com [15.0.48.4]) by madara.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id n1306cY7014410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com (hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com [15.4.92.205]) by masterns.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id n1306b93015468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:06:37 -0800 Received: from htang by hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1LU8oB-0000ZL-3L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:06:31 -0800 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hi all, I have a table where one column consists of inactive dates, such as this: | Date | OK? | |------------------+-----| | [2009-01-30 Fri] | x | | [2009-01-27 Tue] | x | | [2009-01-28 Wed] | x | I can't sort the table by that column. If I change the dates to active, then sorting (by time) works fine. Is this behavior intentional? -- Best, Hsiu-Khuern.