template specific commit functions.

template specific commit functions.

[Richard Riley]

Carsten, I see there is a "check" function to determine if the template
can be used - is there, or could there please be, a function called
which is template specific with the committed remember item (i.e after
merging title etc at C-c C-c time)? I guess that item would be a record
of some sort and the function called could well be, for example, an
interface to twitter or blorg or .... etc.

Re: template specific commit functions.

[Carsten Dominik]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]

Hi Richard,

please make this proposal to JD Smith, I think this fits well into his  
new design for the Org - Remember interaction.  I will not add new  
features to Remember for the time being, only fix bugs.

- Carsten


On Nov 29, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Richard Riley wrote:

>
> Carsten, I see there is a "check" function to determine if the  
> template
> can be used - is there, or could there please be, a function called
> which is template specific with the committed remember item (i.e after
> merging title etc at C-c C-c time)? I guess that item would be a  
> record
> of some sort and the function called could well be, for example, an
> interface to twitter or blorg or .... etc.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1270 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: template specific commit functions.

[James TD Smith]

Hi Richard and Carsten,

On 2008-12-03 09:33:56(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
> please make this proposal to JD Smith, I think this fits well into his  
> new design for the Org - Remember interaction.  I will not add new  
> features to Remember for the time being, only fix bugs.
> 
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
> > Carsten, I see there is a "check" function to determine if the template can
> > be used - is there, or could there please be, a function called which is
> > template specific with the committed remember item (i.e after merging title
> > etc at C-c C-c time)? I guess that item would be a record of some sort and
> > the function called could well be, for example, an interface to twitter or
> > blorg or .... etc.

I've already seen this and will be implementing it.

James

--
|-<James TD Smith>-<email/ahktenzero@mohorovi.cc>-|

Re: template specific commit functions.

[Richard Riley]

James TD Smith <ahktenzero@mohorovi.cc> writes:

> Hi Richard and Carsten,
>
> On 2008-12-03 09:33:56(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> please make this proposal to JD Smith, I think this fits well into his  
>> new design for the Org - Remember interaction.  I will not add new  
>> features to Remember for the time being, only fix bugs.
>> 
>> On Nov 29, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
>> > Carsten, I see there is a "check" function to determine if the template can
>> > be used - is there, or could there please be, a function called which is
>> > template specific with the committed remember item (i.e after merging title
>> > etc at C-c C-c time)? I guess that item would be a record of some sort and
>> > the function called could well be, for example, an interface to twitter or
>> > blorg or .... etc.
>
> I've already seen this and will be implementing it.
>
> James

Wonderful - thanks James.

>
> --
> |-<James TD Smith>-<email/ahktenzero@mohorovi.cc>-|
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

-- 
 important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday.  ~Dennis Gabor, Innovations:  Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970