From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: Re: Git repository Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:33:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20080131163300.GC21213@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <87y7a62eng.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <4A1A58D4-4BE6-468C-B7EC-1324D354DD0D@science.uva.nl> <20080131160113.GC16742@odin.demosthenes.org> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKcLX-0002y9-Si for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:33:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKcLX-0002vx-1x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:33:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKcLW-0002vq-N8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:33:02 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKcLW-00029H-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:33:02 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m0VGX1Fj009301 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:33:01 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m0VGX1SF009296 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:33:01 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080131160113.GC16742@odin.demosthenes.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote: > I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where > git is superior. ;] I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference to issues with the design of the underlying backend. The most obvious symptom of this would be the performance difference - git is well-known to cream pretty much everything except mercurial (which IIRC has a very similar design, minus the object packing). But I'm sure some quick googling would tell you a lot more than my hazy memories do :-)