From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Re: log on state change
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 03:00:13 +0200
Message-ID: <200709040100.l8410DlJ004100@localhost.localdomain>
References: <87abs6j0av.fsf@myhost.localdomain>
	<0ae951a333c90e9d17ccadcfb9e172ee@science.uva.nl>
	<m2sl5vvejw.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ISNes-0005d2-P9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:56:50 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ISNeq-0005bW-Fj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:56:49 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISNeq-0005bQ-CM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:56:48 -0400
Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <xma@gnu.org>) id 1ISNep-0006bW-Py
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:56:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2sl5vvejw.fsf@cam.ac.uk> (message from Leo on Mon, 03 Sep 2007
	18:34:11 +0100)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


   On 2007-09-03 17:25 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
   >>   I would like to record some comments JUST on certain states,
   >> for example I want to mark a task as WAITING and give it a reason,
   >> or the "thing" I am waiting for.
   >
   > This is currently not possible.  Are there more people who would
   > find this a very useful feature?

   I usually add a time stamp and write the reason in the text under the
   heading. So I don't think this is useful.

I also act like this 80% of the time. *But* (yes there is a
*but*), I sometimes do not need to enter anything but just change
the state. So for this reason, I think this could be usefull not
to be asked (This is why I proposed to add a universal prefix to
cycling state for this).

Regards,

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org