From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Timestamps for publishing
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:10:31 -0700
Message-ID: <1FEC1970-7EBA-4164-A459-A91CF4A098B1@uva.nl>
References: <aklk00k37o.fsf@richardriley.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KJWzy-0003oL-9a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:10:34 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KJWzx-0003nz-PP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:10:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37388 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJWzx-0003nt-G8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:10:33 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]:48750)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <C.Dominik@uva.nl>) id 1KJWzx-0004RK-5N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:10:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <aklk00k37o.fsf@richardriley.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Richard G Riley wrote:

>
> Would it be possible for the timestamps of #+included files to be  
> taken
> into account when publishing?

Not easily, no,  Maybe when a general overhaul of org-publish happens,  
not before that.

- Carsten