From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Release 5.23a Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:36:57 +0100 Message-ID: <18E2E852-8D0C-4D6B-998D-E9DD88B8A030@gmail.com> References: <876ACC10-F511-4735-B045-9C9AE248A25A@gmail.com> <874pbbbq6i.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiqF-0008FP-0W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiq7-000890-8o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiq6-00088Q-9R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:02 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZiq4-0002LA-G3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:02 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so4089530fga.30 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:30:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874pbbbq6i.fsf@web.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jost Burkardt Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Jost Burkardt wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik writes: >> >> Changes in Version 5.23 >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Overview >> ======== >> >> - New keyword search agenda view > > I must say, I really, really like this new feature. Finally there's > the > org-feature I can use to mimick org-registry's behaviour, like I > always > wanted it to be. > > The only thing I'm missing is something like *search only TODO > entrys*, > (C-c a S ?). > > Would this be difficult to implement, or can I customize this by some > clever configuration? I imagine I can work around with a search for > something like +TODO +second_keyword, but even then the still the > font-locking ist not available I Jost, you are right that adding "+TODO" (the "+" is actually optional would do this for you. But I can see that a variant that only looks in TODO entries could be useful and would also cover cases where you have several TODO states. I am not sure what you mean with "the font-locking is not available". Please explain. - Carsten