From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>
Subject: Scheme output results
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:06:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1498bbde-0912-a806-f665-47b6f8c5e6e4@ossau.homelinux.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44580)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>) id 1dXT9D-0001Af-3Z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:06:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>) id 1dXT97-0006SD-J1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:06:45 -0400
Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.68]:58370)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>)
	id 1dXT97-0006Pl-Bg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:06:41 -0400
Received: from [10.37.6.195] (unknown [213.86.221.35])
	by arudy.520b.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEDFA38075
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:57:20 +0100 (BST)
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I don't think that Scheme output results are correctly handled. Please 
consider:

#+BEGIN_SRC scheme :results output
(display "a") (newline)
(display "b") (newline)
(display "c") (newline)
'(a b c)
#+END_SRC

#+RESULTS:
: "a\nb\nc\n"

As compared with the Elisp equivalent:

#+BEGIN_SRC elisp :results output
(princ "a") (terpri)
(princ "b") (terpri)
(princ "c") (terpri)
'(a b c)
#+END_SRC

#+RESULTS:
: a
: b
: c

I have a possible fix for this - on another computer, so not to hand 
right now - but thought it would be check first whether you agree with 
me that the Scheme results should be more like the Elisp ones.

Regards - Neil