From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-e-latex: Tables get correct amount of vertical space
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:51 -0500
Message-ID: <12357.1352824371@alphaville>
References: <87d2zhr2ym.fsf@gmail.com> <80a9ulsgdv.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87a9ulr19m.fsf@gmail.com> <11825.1352822198@alphaville>
	<801ufxscmi.fsf@somewhere.org> <12077.1352823659@alphaville>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55082)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TYJQ1-0006bo-36
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:33:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TYJPy-0003Cs-18
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:57 -0500
Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:43036)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1TYJPx-0003Ci-S7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
	of "Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:20:59 EST." <12077.1352823659@alphaville>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:

> 
> I think I read the whole thread but I'm still not clear on why
> the change is needed. What goes awry with the environment instead
> of the declaration?
> 

Never mind - I didn't read the whole thread.

Nick