From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jason F. McBrayer" Subject: Re: Buglet with scheduled in TODO lists Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1172153084.30646.3.camel@bertrand.carcosa.net> References: <1172088240.7461.9.camel@bertrand.carcosa.net> <0d74887dd2f5bf60f40d4ff5ae728560@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKEZ0-0006j4-Uv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKEYy-0006i2-N5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:50 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKEYy-0006hw-FO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:48 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.102]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HKEYx-00030g-V7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:48 -0500 Received: from bertrand.carcosa.net (cpe-024-168-217-245.sc.res.rr.com [24.168.217.245]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1ME4j7n007984 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:04:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <0d74887dd2f5bf60f40d4ff5ae728560@science.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 08:19 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > The second bug is that yes, indeed, the scheduling line could/should > also > be found further down. I can fix that too, but there are also other > places where the code assumes (I believe) that this info is always in > the second line. I am not yet sure if I will change this. For my purposes, the patch you already provided should be fine. There's no reason I would _intentionally_ put the scheduling line anywhere but below the headline. Really, it _should_ find the scheduling line anywhere before the next headline, but with the first bug fixed, I'm unlikely to notice whether it does or not. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |