emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "J. G." <jerzor@pacbell.net>
To: Orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Linking SCHEDULED and DEADLINE repeating timestamps to avoid desynchronization
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:44:05 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032532251.385739.1682523845362@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1032532251.385739.1682523845362.ref@mail.yahoo.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]

Hi everyone, I just stumbled across a surprising behavior with combined SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps that repeat. Here is the example org file contents:
* TODO My late recurring todoSCHEDULED: <2023-04-12 Wed ++1w> DEADLINE: <2023-04-13 Thu ++1w>
Right now it is Wednesday (2023-04-26 to be precise), and as shown above, my task had a scheduled timestamp on a Wednesday from a previous week. The repeater is ++1w, so marking the task as done bumps it to repeat on Wednesday of next week (2023-05-03 to be precise). That functions as expected.
But the deadline timestamp is on a Thursday of a previous week with a repeater of ++1w, so marking the task as done bumps it to Thursday of this week (2023-04-27 to be precise). So marking it as done it has the logical but unexpected result of having the scheduled timestamp for a date (2023-05-03) after the deadline timestamp (2023-04-27).
Is there a way to link the timestamps so that marking the task done will always bump the deadline timestamp after the scheduled timestamp? On the IRC channel I was kindly directed to look into org-todo-repeat-hook as a way to approach it, but to share this here in the mailing list as an edge case to be considered.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1547 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2023-04-26 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1032532251.385739.1682523845362.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2023-04-26 15:44 ` J. G. [this message]
2023-04-27 11:30   ` [BUG] Linking SCHEDULED and DEADLINE repeating timestamps to avoid desynchronization Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-27 15:24     ` J. G.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1032532251.385739.1682523845362@mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=jerzor@pacbell.net \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).