For the very silly reason that I was not aware of it >.< . Thank you, Ihor. 

For the uninformed: evaluate this as a lisp expression (require 'oc-biblatex) . Also, you can use either  #+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage... (like shown in this thread) or style options with #+cite_export: biblatex (read the documentation for oc-biblatex.el). I tested like this (and with the \usepackage line too):

    #+cite_export: biblatex
    #+bibliography: your_file.bib

This:

    #+cite_export: biblatex "bibstyle=numeric-comp,sorting=none, hyperref=true,backref=true,url=true,backend=biber,natbib=true"

will create

    \usepackage[style=bibstyle=numeric-comp,sorting=none, hyperref=true,backref=true,url=true,backend=biber,natbib=true]{biblatex}

(note the style=bibstyle=)

I would suggest that the org-info pages mention (require 'oc-biblatex) and show an example of  how one can use extra options (with the #+latex_header as well). Further, may be it would be better to allow something like this:

    #+cite_export: biblatex "bibstyle=numeric-comp,sorting=none, hyperref=true,backref=true,url=true,backend=biber,natbib=true"
    #+bibliography: your_file.bib

For which one can use the appended patch, which may break other things, of course :P . The gain is control over biblatex options without resorting to #+latex_header: \usepackage[...]{biblatex}

Cheers! Thanks.

January 21, 2023 at 9:37:18 AM CET Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:Edgar Lux <edgarlux@mailfence.com> writes:

I now looked at the patch and I have one general question. What you
don't just use oc-biblatex in the above?


-- 
Sent with https://mailfence.com  
Secure and private email