From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Harkins Subject: Re: LaTeX export with listings: multicolumn support broken? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:03:41 +0800 Message-ID: <0d5f47ef-bee2-4e67-875e-3a1883c11e4b@dewdrop-world.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlKo-0003dG-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:04:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlKi-0001rP-Aa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:04:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]:58935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqlKi-0001rJ-3Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:04:16 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q10so9638161pdj.36 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:04:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([219.136.160.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sx8sm38927959pab.5.2013.12.11.07.04.09 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:04:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: orgmode On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:54:37 PM HKT, James Harkins wrote: > I have also tried > > #+ATTR_LaTeX: :float multicolumn :options [htb] > > per documentation at [1]. I still get \begin{figure}, not=20 \begin{figure*}. Forgot the footnote: it's=20 http://orgmode.org/manual/LaTeX-specific-attributes.html#LaTeX-specific-attri= butes Anyway, I've tested 8.2, 8.1.2, 8.1.0 and a previous "sandbox" branch I=20 used at some point in the past. None of them give me multicolumn figures=20 for code blocks. Well, certainly it worked back in August... hjh