From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan L Tyree Subject: Re: Running org-mode (and emacs) inside the Web browser ? Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:25:57 +1100 Message-ID: <0cf40fb6-3715-f5aa-7e15-fdf76aedf60e@gmail.com> References: <87po98y4im.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> Reply-To: alantyree@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8h2q-0000IV-Le for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:26:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8h2p-0005U7-LO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:26:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]:48881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8h2p-0005To-Em for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:26:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v78so8533458pgb.5 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 23:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8003:2418:8d00:4637:e6ff:fec4:57? ([2001:8003:2418:8d00:4637:e6ff:fec4:57]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g24sm22671654pfk.0.2017.10.28.23.25.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Oct 2017 23:26:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87po98y4im.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> Content-Language: en-AU List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 28/10/17 02:49, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > > I'm not exactly sure why that would be worth doing... but I can imagine > running that Emacs Web browser port over some kind of versioned file > system, and Emacs conf files (org + tangling, of course), so that you > have "your" org-mode at hand from anywhere using a URL and a browser > tab... of course, using a keyboard for browsing that tab would be better > than a touch screen, re keyboard shortcuts. Chromebook would be one good reason. Cheers, Alan -- Alan L Tyree http://www.austlii.edu.au/~alan