From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Re: Two bugs
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:39:59 +0200
Message-ID: <0a934958eb97965702f067ca0119c275@science.uva.nl>
References: <m28xb6fk02.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
	<9d6b6efbd81deb17ae0ac5b47ed4c2b8@science.uva.nl>
	<m23b1d96ts.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Htlop-0001FN-LX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:40:03 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Htlom-0001DE-SS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:40:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htlom-0001DB-K9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:40:00 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1Htlom-0006cC-4D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:40:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m23b1d96ts.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On May 31, 2007, at 2:26, Leo wrote:
>> This is clearly a matter of taste.  Certainly the cursor should be
>> moved to a visible location, would you agree?
>
> Yes, that is convenient.
>
>> The motivation for the current behavior is: If you switch to overview
>> mode, you probably want to see as much of the file as possible, so my
>> instinct was to put it back to the first heading.  But maybe you are
>> right that this is not good if there are many screens full of top
>> level headings......
>
> It is also INCONVENIENT when each top level has a lot of level 2
> entries. For example when you are looking at a subtree and suddenly 
> want
> to see an overview of the document, you often want to get back to the
> original subtree after visibility cycling.

I agree, so this will be fixed.

Thanks.

- Carsten