From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IMLCFNmqzl4TeAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 18:00:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yKiwENmqzl6fRwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 18:00:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BBD09400EF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 18:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0MH-0004mk-K0 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:00:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0L9-0004Kr-FL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:59:45 -0400 Received: from confino.investici.org ([212.103.72.250]:21375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0L7-0000Gu-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:59:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by confino.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60556210D6; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:59:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anche.no; s=stigmate; t=1590602369; bh=a6K247IXl8KKrfIlXFnJVnnjBag/7vuKHil0w7eM+KA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=eib1ivo49hb+nVLW3eM+RBqDb+EowgI3JdVjeB0ib5gQj2lnr0omsm6j+saH8zVSi fCmA2t7bX+tKuIAceLDL7wlcB9ffatPdSSFFwPgKSzZgJkmN4+Z3soMzN+QuSxGSFT XTpmd3aUL+G0BZOhObd1Kan35PqGgEVG5Mgarjxw= Received: from [212.103.72.250] (mx1.investici.org [212.103.72.250]) (Authenticated sender: mariotomo@inventati.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75FBC20FD6; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: issue tracker? To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org References: <87ftbw3mvw.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <6ffc8465-fdeb-4981-8303-43f09e26e0c1@www.fastmail.com> <20200519073352.GC7874@tuxteam.de> From: Mario Frasca Message-ID: <08ee796b-d541-69f3-518e-f577d9b29f0b@anche.no> Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:59:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.103.72.250; envelope-from=mario@anche.no; helo=confino.investici.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/27 13:59:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=anche.no header.s=stigmate header.b=eib1ivo4; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.21 X-TUID: I/bMiKwrF5wZ myself, I recently posted a patch, received zero reaction, and have the impression it's now lost in the logs of this mailing list.  indeed pretty inefficient! something which flashed to my mind while writing this email: we're dealing with an emacs software, part of emacs, can we just use M-x report-emacs-bug? cheers, MF On 19/05/2020 09:58, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Regardless, doing issue tracking, discussion, and patch submission on > a ML in 2020 is pretty odd and inefficient. > > I would have submitted feedback here 6-12 months earlier than I did if > org had a proper issue tracker.