Re: [PATCH] may we focus on readability?

[Mario Frasca <mario@anche.no>]

On 16/06/2020 11:56, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> what about waiting until bureaucracy
> is over?

I'm fine with it, but I'm accumulating several adjustments, and it's 
being difficult to keep track of each of them separately.

> Of course, this assumes you're planning to sign FSF papers.
I have signed and sent them in, 5th of June.

like … I'm adding a way to collect #+PLOT lines depending on which set 
of settings I want, to produce the graph.

#+PLOT[1]: set:"yrange [0:4200]"
#+PLOT[1]: set:"key at 33,4100 top left spacing 1.4"
#+PLOT[1]: set:"arrow from 59.5,0 rto 0,4200 nohead ls 1"
#+PLOT[2]: set:"yrange [50:10000]" set:"logscale y 10"
#+PLOT[2]: set:"key at 35,9000 top left spacing 1.4"
#+plot[2]: set:"arrow from 59.5,50 rto 0,200 nohead ls 1"
#+PLOT: set:"xtics rotate by 90" set:"mouse mouseformat ' '"
#+PLOT: ind:1 deps:(6 3 7 4 10) xticdep:15
#+plot: use:2
|  n |  data | prove, |  casi, | ratio |   prove, |    casi, | 7run | 
casi*6 |  casi, | cum-p | cum-c | cum-r |   ++% | lunes |
|    |       | valore | valore |       |    media |    media |      
|        | m.c.*5 |       |       |       |       | |

the #+plot: use:2 tells the program to collect PLOT[2] lines and to skip 
plot[1] definitions.

it needs be the first one met by the program, or at least precede any 
such lines.

oh, and the xticdep is an other addition

both I haven't shared yet, because it's a bit complicated doing so while 
the code doesn't contain the previous changes.

ciao, Mario