From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1401A429E28
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id P+eQOd8cPN2w for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4FE3429E27
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
	p7V5Mn10008861
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:22:49 +0300
Received: (from too@localhost)
	by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p7V5MmTV008860;
	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:22:48 +0300
X-Authentication-Warning: taco2.nixu.fi: too set sender to
	tomi.ollila@nixu.com using -f
From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Patch formatting:
References: <8739gj2r39.fsf@pc44es141.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
	<yf6hb4zrwik.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi> <878vqbywed.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<yf6mxerqcdq.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi> <yf6aaaqr7gt.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
	<87mxeqabbv.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
	<CAH-f9WsA1TuDQXz52c_2J=2SYKHiJQaMyaP1XVaZCh8NmsBQOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k49uz7nr.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
	$[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
	!)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:22:48 +0300
In-Reply-To: <87k49uz7nr.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> (Jameson Graef
	Rollins's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:33:44 -0700")
Message-ID: <yf662lep32v.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:22:53 -0000

On Wed 31 Aug 2011 04:33, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:

> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:22:15 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:
>> I would say start right off with git send-email, since it takes care
>> of every single formatting guideline and also makes it easy to send
>> entire patch series.  It seems like the most beginner-friendly way to
>> send patches, while at the same time serving power-patchers well.
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure why/how that keeps getting lost.
>
> Just use git send-email!  It takes care of everything.

Ok I change the order to prefer send-email (and drop/modify "obsolete"
stuff).

I have to check git-send-email documentation as every shell on various
linuxes give me this:

$ git --version 
git version 1.7.3.4
$ git send-email  
git: 'send-email' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.

>
> jamie.

Thanks for comments,

Tomi