From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFE96DE098B for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:19:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.124, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.211, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxX7iVAM7cMA for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com (mail-pf0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9A86DE00EB for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 189so112584911pfz.3 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:19:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=Rc1eKdIHk9P8sboOmxJ9l/Zj5Q8R341xBgMznKh+Zdk=; b=gLxvvM/Ju1FOE2grAU6atNRtug0gsTR8fGa43StjnUsXYNzIaA4SGshef/zQwMK7K7 HejRGjnNJgfHASmGiC6ABw6HpNyMpxtjgj5CgWiCixSt/n+1I6kpG8bI3NsHThrlDXKn 3fC54xSp/8IGAIliaAvWHHj6lbw7Wxl7ZoYvFNBWX2gWyXLkDtqAEUwPLiA9d1UhJj86 yVrpPgrIiND/01Bni9I4PPYU7bbI4njuypj05ZJ8yc0DRzMDvXwvKVRJvrDWa2p6Cqq4 wuG3nC4DzUmRp0qfkcP+qpGQ/eSd5AABhdkJ6e7Y9FMtPFttkTtDkQFt/VCWcv4yWmU8 M7IQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=Rc1eKdIHk9P8sboOmxJ9l/Zj5Q8R341xBgMznKh+Zdk=; b=NaEAj2Wm/FmL4dOrZKyWachFEGeb9FIzQrXLiFrQ4IguHv/26a5ha+WkDCHY5bBUyR pkM/AXCWzrvXgHpH+FjHBMc3ysZlJtM7+mP91vitL5ZVRswrH0btX4HmQaVMqMEwsZg9 fuFzgU0orEOXqkpz50wyBsmJRn4T4WY6tlBU7mmABlDYIF+lmftKyb5H5vQFNF7fUTwj ALFrT1aheediM4UWCGilyDM0LDh6WFq9fe5FjCRva3RKsO8nNQNh4DTPYZU5FQWnGame HOZD/WNrsbHDtRk1EJAsfhMnAcO/cpIkQstwW0Ck7zf1KbOHmRiKBnUDwtvEjftnhg0a +ARQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvejjrLQua8rhwJr6ojHoc6PpROQWRarBVaDJSq0YUb2Nc6bjqfzC5H3OV1w2zLhYAS8 X-Received: by 10.99.49.213 with SMTP id x204mr8843147pgx.92.1478632780510; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from marmstrong-linux.kir.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1008:11:6cc1:8e17:840f:2588]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm50172086paw.2.2016.11.08.11.19.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:19:40 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Armstrong To: Jani Nikula Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Notmuch dev workflow: applying patches to local trees In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:19:39 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:19:44 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Matt Armstrong wrote: >> I'm not experienced with managing patches via email on this list, >> especially when it comes to applying patches sent out for review and >> testing. Is there a documented best practice? > > Not sure about best practice, but this works for me: > > M-x cd RET /path/to/repo RET > > Apply a single patch in show mode: > | git am RET > > Apply all expanded patch messages in a thread in show mode: > C-u | git am RET Ah, notmuch-show-pipe-message is what I was missing. Thanks Jani.