From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MCPMA/4At16GFwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:14:06 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id ANGSDwsBt15iLgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:14:19 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D5E940E99 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 19:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999426DE0222; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jfUIegPEmPE; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745E96DE0225; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AD06DE0225 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZkH_3qpuV29 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com (mail-qk1-f193.google.com [209.85.222.193]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3046DE0222 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id i14so4423200qka.10 for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=jhrf801jey/adKqaXm7MNM82FPYyl92b4lerNxtgBbw=; b=lrI71sVNu66U0SsrCmkYueu0FMew0+EC/E5ElTqHNwFBzF/MSqwOEndRs4zMduA46U WphgzCebRMEAnuKDdIQ4PadKQAOW+RdFXt6B8DdLlagL2SVU2zA8MNNgt1oe4J9crt9E +NVQ/Vudx44rfSg7ojZVErIuMTHABL58GZ+VdL44LY6t41wj9t3iMXMBRZwux2zTryVl tgwo9xoC9op0vFkDkZrRbs9fZMKol8A7cE6lummNM2GrQEs+CV78X14Qq/CojlS+00dw 1BOA6PY725bNvvIxwin3BtZlFT1s2YsGrn0RQ1kN+NGYRGAyjU+L+uXLAplyYKDO1svK thyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=jhrf801jey/adKqaXm7MNM82FPYyl92b4lerNxtgBbw=; b=UGDM1eU0hyutKuXDg3ktdgS3AcKOyKi6Srk0mwOL0xxLC4xkbf79Lp9H7lPauuVmHE oBl3Q4yHGcb5ApiTSAi3OxBQyqWxHgy175VpALNIigczs0QiPSfSdvgTzdYe1BtkMrd5 anvDSCEeSpqlE26hIgeoPDNksfXOg1+q77Geebxy/achwgyXVajC2/C/kPs2B0f/eJTf NAHtcesW3VZTh3LVadMml7A539bimbpvN4ntCZUY4x2K39jIiBqeFV+NQho2HtjX3raE 4ahJXxtFda8BlybFo5fgJa+S51NM9mKe4z6+WCsvEbZUh/Rpum4NtFDkC3TcHD/a45PG FgGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puba8Ml/8/LQ/In7goVDCrIA4TNlDNsed21H77r7eWLGD5E+Ev/d Zq+e8c6i7Zu1TMAASlh+exg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI88G1WTP5vJiBUFLdPzLu+xEuv4bpoj4daOngu7ZhbX+huhIg1372DiR5YX8qoxW4EgJFw1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9bcf:: with SMTP id d198mr8390079qke.423.1589051646498; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpe-74-72-51-189.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.72.51.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o3sm4670023qtt.56.2020.05.09.12.14.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 09 May 2020 12:14:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Radu Butoi To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: split-window-sensibly in tree mode with open message In-Reply-To: <875zddgt9o.fsf@tethera.net> References: <875zddgt9o.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 15:14:04 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lrI71sVN; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.09 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.4550855431588]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 27017(-0.18), country: US(-0.00), ip: 50.126.95.6(-0.46)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:-]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[notmuchmail.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:27017, ipnet:50.126.64.0/18, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rbutoi@gmail.com,notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[74.72.51.189:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[notmuchmail.org:email,tethera.net:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[notmuch@notmuchmail.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : SPF not aligned (relaxed),none] X-TUID: 0K68/bvaK7E4 Hi David, David Bremner writes: > We seem to have got into the habit of updating the NEWS file right > before release. This seems to work OK, and avoids some conflicts between > patch series. Makes sense, probably something like: When opening message pane in tree-mode, split window horizontally or vertically depending on available space, set by split-{width,height}-threshold. Otherwise, does the patch look good? split-window-sensibly seems to be a drop-in replacement for split-window-*. Best, Radu