From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <whitebox@nefkom.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3444C40BC7F
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 9gIhgg44ji+l for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8127340BC74
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180])
	by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAE01C15761;
	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:57:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-99-164.dynamic.mnet-online.de
	[88.217.99.164])
	by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD2D1C001B0;
	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:57:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 59AD7CA297; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:57:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Subject: Re: bug#6214: 23.1; json-read-string crashes emacs with long string
References: <87pr0t5h1q.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87fx1pkrsh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87tymzv6ga.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<878w4afozw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87sk2hbq3s.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<8739ug3mrr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r5i02uo7.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<874oeuv4le.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fwye2sxt.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<87pqxhmg0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87sk2dxl01.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
X-Yow: ..  I'm IMAGINING a sensuous GIRAFFE, CAVORTING in the BACK ROOM
	of a KOSHER DELI --
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:57:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87sk2dxl01.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of
	"Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:27:25 -0400")
Message-ID: <m2y6c5ez3r.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:14:24 -0700
Cc: 6214@debbugs.gnu.org, Notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:58:21 -0000

Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:

> Never mind, I got confused.  SAFE_ALLOCA uses record_unwind_protect, so
> it's gc safe.

No, it isn't.  SAFE_ALLOCA only protects the memory block, you need to
use SAVE_ALLOCA_LISP to protect also its contents.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."