From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1255F431FBD for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K+PAdZUemk9g for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF773431FAE for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721FB100199; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:07:35 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups In-Reply-To: <20140713174135.GA23983@odin.tremily.us> References: <20140713174135.GA23983@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+25~gdaf4b6f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 20:07:46 -0000 On Sun, Jul 13 2014, "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:05:41AM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I >> wonder whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic >> i.e. is invading that "namespace". If no one else has the same >> feeling (or the feeling is just wrong (or insignificant)) then this >> can be forgotten :D > > For what it's worth, I don't have any =E2=80=98rst-*=E2=80=99 commands on= my system. > I do have =E2=80=98rst2*=E2=80=99 commands, and an =E2=80=98rstpep2html.p= y=E2=80=99. I'm happy to > rename to whatever, but rst-man2any.py was the best that I could think > of following the texi2any pattern. Well, IMO both the first 'prerst2x.py' (or how was it called) & this rst-man2any.py would be good as those were to be included as is to notmuch -- when there is something else to comment then I often try to suggest some little details in style (and might not always get it right...) But now, as this rst-man2any.py uses argparse -- which is not python 2.6 compatible (and we currently kind of try to keep python 2.6 supported=20 (rhel 6, and compatibles, among other older but relevant distros(*))) Therefore I simply suggest to return back to prerst2x.py -- as other alternatives are just too tedious to do -- unnecessary waste of time. > Cheers, > Trevor (*) although newer-enough zlib is not there -- but again, that one patch of mine should be easy enough to apply... Tomi