From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D66DE0946 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.514 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.119, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlHdlAMtYWUb for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288916DE0297 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id l2so45208050wml.2 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=D453gnzRBQ4oZWZvdQ1dkk0WZj1BLB+/Lk/cIVIrQ3o=; b=WnXNEr5ilEuS5Cd15bHs/sHNk5eojzRxErQX/ISMxwoy/AJdz0QuCQxpVsErhkhjJi fVPSmVlaho3eH+0FqFguDM+2349UZLgk0o4EuPTdigQlTue/8IHTMc5hhzulFUqFNA03 9K5wk6LL/m8H/F60j4/0LGKHiEGYKppnXo+EwhZ3bOsvAZunVQ89olFyGnMkub5Q0j8+ CWcYm37FEpj7xSOsPQK/ukAM1pN1OisbP7jVxz20+iIoCoC5VxoDQ8xtjl2/2wn6Fu6A q1U6+jDDonAs/9SEd8I2wB/WPPQc00gOogNAgj6oYowv0X/ZzQ/HKiOOE9hYVbEcWdZU 0mtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=D453gnzRBQ4oZWZvdQ1dkk0WZj1BLB+/Lk/cIVIrQ3o=; b=QQotEKXosPw1kZqneD0o7PPTXUldssUal+pSBgv8KIssFfiHXgyrkcOEwazjj4U2Sj 5+h7d2HC0z9IMak5hPYc7KrFMwoyl9Am5g+eLOzGHucqyJQlWLIwWb2uoomxgHPME+dH zQzyxVjAaEwIrJDgzJ6/LHWtkBwF4jVO8kwZ8CMsERDfDwoo4qDj6q/ba69aD/pfze3W asFDTKI4I/srXWPEXImghS9X1X+1s/Yil5SFD02QmSdYbkRrNQUt52MnJEz4yRLVie0F DU2g8Na8Dkj3bgKT9jL2rIR1XHt4Onp2Hv1vlUunOm3l4bIJqJEd8km2cxEqjwylDfP8 a0jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI1BH5jfYDrmTaCX4tx3bMx5eWDH4xBujQodTf/ZFlDMVFmiLOIu206GmdjKbzEXQ== X-Received: by 10.28.51.141 with SMTP id z135mr38185831wmz.109.1483099836933; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net. [81.149.164.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ef10sm73193646wjd.22.2016.12.30.04.10.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 04:10:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id f2b43cf8; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:10:35 +0000 (UTC) To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v1 0/2] Improve the display of headers. In-Reply-To: <87vau21001.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> References: <20161228121825.11265-1-dme@dme.org> <87a8beg7uw.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <87vau21001.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> X-HGTTG: heart-of-gold From: David Edmondson Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:10:34 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:10:40 -0000 On Fri, Dec 30 2016, David Bremner wrote: > David Edmondson writes: > >> On Thu, Dec 29 2016, David Bremner wrote: >> >>> David Edmondson writes: >>> >>>> This is a pair of patches that attempt to make header display more >>>> pleasant to look at. RFC! >>>> >>>> I will update the tests if the results of the changes are considered >>>> useful, of course. >>>> >>> >>> Hi David; >>> >>> The wrapping seems a bit fragile. Some of the lines are wrapped to the >>> left column and others line up with the headers. To reproduce, try >>> id:87wpgjxeia.fsf@nikula.org at about 40 columns. It looks like two >>> different kinds of wrapping going on. >> >> This doesn't reproduce for me. Do you have any interesting settings >> relating to line wrapping or truncation? > > I don't think so. I can duplicate this with ./devel/try-emacs-mua -Q > with emacs 24 and 25. Ah, this is caused by `truncate-lines' being `nil', which is the result of `notmuch-show-hook' including `notmuch-show-turn-on-visual-line-mode' by default - I have never used that. Ugh, so the implication of this is that most people are seeing horribly wrapped headers all of the time!