From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DE96DE0F51 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.306 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.348, DKIMWL_WL_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xq-JEunuT5zu for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE456DE0F1C for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z24so2302297wmi.5 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pWw/LCLzA4Y7iGg5Fo83SJcm2uZrQsgyoZhob86gbCw=; b=G7mCbE847Dyi0ITOVwvMiQHQu263tbZLb7r6bMeMMeMGxm6q0pJueQ70zQtKhTwI8U YIusVPh9qLr+1alCrjbSKypOu6+xGu+cIeZtTLlETbtIiUxBoEi7uNTlYiJQAwy/IfyO XfgEVwTGf53n0afh+BhMHHgRWS3O9HeAsYzmMzkAXiKjHp21A6d8o2hOsBlo1+8QCziz yZWKJMurStCgZ9Kforwkd4yH8/yJRNDfnijfvsRijljtGq7+Yn6I7N+F0xcyoTzRb4E/ xVT4qlOY3Op0JGmh51dU1aEZ3ZViU/cn2XNZXmiMFZVMQxgVBqVLCARqniJ7qphIg/03 ORgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pWw/LCLzA4Y7iGg5Fo83SJcm2uZrQsgyoZhob86gbCw=; b=sWV9NwYwceEIFDgHZlXHeDIlNAmK1TCjnXIt/lFrz875lxnzq+i1/8lxD8DuK4X9hg Kjdk+IOvSx7u2wvZ5v4dQ6WNIb2IAgCtQ/ZGUh8WsVf7djbeJKVDFfx6duHJsgALXuV5 RjYy+S1KnrcboVu2g9Zs17wy09Q3K3BL72pheKnrBFBKq5twmMp2SsK4SlFbKWzs8WCp jfjC2ZLW2eT7JOLrdGw4FWpPV9Eh7VIEpLtGLxNN0YnoQKaDqx6TqxCP2ATxuLtjyrdf sMQcQD2IYesCON49xZPeFwzPcbQYxLiF7+7uE4My3FXs2xnpQ8vxY826WGOyK+ZJGdBx DlWw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUqFH5rIrZzRNXMMvabRBqh1lQoSQFoaCm9rGKf1KgH58mpduHO Tr4Rit98I0D8JmSjQO4m7fr1k74xKvk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsXIfQuboiihQQcTskDoPNk9Yn4D0PhZieGYFjmlqDghM12+rgIf+nnHHBH+RU6CN5H5TcKw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cfcb:: with SMTP id f194mr2488726wmg.51.1554897878616; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net. [81.149.164.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm28761283wrs.6.2019.04.10.05.04.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a3eb2eb5; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:04:36 +0000 (UTC) To: Pierre Neidhardt , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Reply inline in notmuch-show buffer, "mu4e-conversation style" In-Reply-To: <87v9zm9ix2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <877ecvb0q7.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <877ecvm05y.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tvffqwp0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7gyb06w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9zm9ix2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-HGTTG: heart-of-gold From: David Edmondson Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:04:36 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:04:41 -0000 On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 at 13:52:25 +02, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > David Edmondson writes: > >> How? Don't I still have to hit one key? > > No, you just start writing at the end of the buffer, this area is then > marked as writable. Understood. >>> - No need to play with buffers to display both the thread and the compo= sition. >> >> If a thread is any length, I will want to split the window to show older >> mail while I'm writing my comments at the bottom of the thread. So there >> might only be one buffer, but two windows, so I'm not sure of the >> benefit. > > True. But if the thread is not that long, or if we only want to look at > the last thread, then we don't need to. With a separate buffer, we > always have to play with the buffers to display them side by side, for in= stance. Yes. >> Well, this presumes a particular workflow and set of mail >> clients. Whether it's a good idea to top post without the bottom is >> debatable, I think. > > I'm confused: can it be top-posting if there is no citation? I was struggling to express myself :-) Perhaps =E2=80=9Cwithout any context=E2=80=9D would be better. > Citations don't offer much guarantee in terms of data integrity. If > someone wants to read the previous message, they should open the > previous message, regardless of the workflow / client I think. > > All this can be made optional and configurable. Yes. My argument was not that we shouldn't have this, just that I wonder if it results in a good workflow for people who are not using notmuch/mu4e/gmail (or any other client that shares the same kind of thread view). dme. --=20 Leaves are falling all around, it's time I was on my way.