From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C038D431FAF for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUba0EULPlkw for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B56F431FAE for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id D214C68055; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:02:33 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Mark Walters , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name. In-Reply-To: <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:02:38 -0000 On Mon, Apr 16 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net" >> >> Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left >> is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop >> the "delete" coloring altogether ? > > Sorry, yes, I suppose this patch should still be applied. Excludes for > "deleted" are the default, I believe, so if we are going to refer to it > in documentation we should probably be consistent. That said, the following change in nmbug repository D 1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net needs-review A 1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net trivial pushed. Tomi > > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters wrote: >>> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for >>> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile >>> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the >>> time looked positive). >> >> Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list. >> After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that >> notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations. Users who wish >> to do so can add support on their own: > > I think my reaction here was a little strong. I'm not remembering how I > got the impression that there was more opposition to adding delete > keybindings than there was support. I suppose now that excludes work so > well one (not me) might consider revisiting the issue. > > jamie. > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch