From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: parallel test failures
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:22:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2v9adc441.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfbafdk8.fsf@tethera.net>
On Fri, Feb 26 2021, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
>
>>
>> Thanks to both of you for your feedback / suggestions. I did read today
>> that timeout exits with 124 when the time limit is reached. I haven't
>> investigated further (nor do I know how the timelimit should be reached,
>> since the whold build+test cycle takes about 10s on this machine.
>
> Maybe a timeout is not so crazy. I ran a couple of trials with
> NOTMUCH_TEST_TIMEOUT=0, and it eventually hung (after 6, and 110
> repetitions) in T355-smime, as far as I can tell on the first test.
> I'm currently running some trials to see if I can duplicate that without
> parallel execution, but that of course takes longer.
So, AFAIU, you got 124 since timeout(1) exited with that status (and
killed all parallel(1) executions (after 2 minutes in that case?)...
... and when you set NOTMUCH_TEST_TIMEOUT=0 then timeout(1) was not
executed and a test hung (probably T355-smime).
In any way you get it again to hung state (w/o using timeout(1) to
mess around) you probably can peek things with ps, /proc, strace,
gdb, or with some other (potentially more sophisticated ;) tools.
>
> d
Tomi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-19 12:24 parallel test failures David Bremner
2021-02-21 18:21 ` Xu Wang
2021-02-25 19:33 ` Tomi Ollila
2021-02-26 11:49 ` David Bremner
2021-02-27 2:29 ` David Bremner
2021-02-27 8:22 ` Tomi Ollila [this message]
2021-02-27 11:41 ` David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2v9adc441.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi \
--to=tomi.ollila@iki.fi \
--cc=david@tethera.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).