From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3E431FAF for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:00:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtiL7e3NoOcF for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036EA431FAE for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A921000E5; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:00:41 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add customization group for replying In-Reply-To: <874nnbvaff.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <1343311113-22171-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87vcfu2qap.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87zk55n44x.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <874nnbvaff.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+11~gd9bf007 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:00:34 -0000 On Thu, Sep 06 2012, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> >> From consistency point of view all the customization variables in notmuch >> groups start with "notmuch-" and these "message-" breaks this... An >> alternative to the above could be the following: >> >> (defgroup notmuch-reply >> '((notmuch-message-replied-tags custom-variable) >> (message-insertion custom-group)) >> "..." > > Why not. Updated patch follows... Ok, next iteration after that is partly my fault ;/ > -Michal Tomi