From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1156DE00CB for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:54:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.202 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.194, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLQukTsoyXeK for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A846DE005F for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EC210005A; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:52:47 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] cli: add support for deduplicating based on case insensitive address In-Reply-To: <874mjht1y6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <874mjht1y6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+68~g0c35549 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:54:21 -0000 On Sun, Aug 30 2015, David Bremner wrote: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> Consider all variants of an email address as one, and print the most >> common variant. > > Other than the quibbles already mentioned, the series looks ok to > me. For production it should have one or two tests I guess. Oh, and man > page updates. But you knew that I guess. > > I can live with the current argument syntax, but since a certain a mount > of bikeshedding is expected, here is an alternative suggestion > > --deduplication={none|mailbox|address} (is s/deduplicate/deduplication/ intended or accidental change?) Is this complete alternative to --deduplicate={no|yes|address}, respectively? If it is it looks somewhat better to me (provided that it is accurate) anyway, the user command line interface looks good to me. Tomi