From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1D16DE167C
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.501
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.151, 
 SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hsqBKDjZKW20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6A26DE163F
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1262610008D;
 Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:24:54 +0200 (EET)
From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Thomas Klausner <tk@giga.or.at>
Cc: Notmuch list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: notmuch-0.18 issues [was Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath()
 compatibility issue; clang visibility problem]
In-Reply-To: <87innepita.fsf@tethera.net>
References: <20140103214735.GG27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
 <87ob0c6p0e.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20140408123312.GZ5053@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
 <sfid-H20140626-143836-+023.12-1@spamfilter.osbf.lua>
 <87a98zho9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>
 <20140626130826.GL11862@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <87innepita.fsf@tethera.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.23.5+113~gfa95df1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:24:53 +0200
Message-ID: <m2lgsatnkq.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:25:34 -0000

On Sun, Mar 12 2017, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:

> Thomas Klausner <tk@giga.or.at> writes:
>
>>
>> 1. pkgsrc's copy of rst2man is called "rst2man.py". The configure test
>>
>
> Since I see notmuch in pkgsrc for netbsd, I guess things have improved.
> I had a quick look at the pkgsrc patches [1].  I don't think we're
> interested in carrying the zlib workarounds upstream, but I guess we

Note that notmuch dump/restore may not work correctly with zlib 1.2.3 !
I tried a while ago (someone suggested on this mailing list) and got
corrupted data. If newer netbsd has newer zlib I'd suggest to use that.

My 3-year old "supportive patch"
https://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2014/017918.html
still works nicely (building with it on one system and using in two).


> could look at a rename of libutil.a. 'libmyutil.a' is not really nice,
> but I guess we could use libnmutil.a or libnotmuch_util.a.
>
> Any upstream contributors with opinions on what colour we should paint
> this particular unicycle shed?

>From those 2 my vote would be libnotmuch_util.a. I'd think more of it but I
probably forget.

>
> d
>
> [1]: http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/mail/notmuch/patches/


Tomi