From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD436DE141E for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.236 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.160, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nv1c-m1xwEF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770CC6DE0B26 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476D11000CA; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:37:22 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli/lib: remove support for GMime 2.4 In-Reply-To: <874mjygvyb.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> References: <1439739201-11068-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <874mjygvyb.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+61~g1eba370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:38:57 -0000 On Mon, Aug 17 2015, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sun 2015-08-16 21:53:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 16 2015, David Bremner wrote: >> >>> It's becoming a maintenance burden to do anything things with the >>> crypto glue code twice, once for 2.4 and once for 2.6. I don't have >>> any 2.4 version available to test on my development machine anymore, >>> so the 2.4 specific code paths are likely not very well tested. >>> --- >>> >>> I started to rebase the SMIME signature verification patches and got >>> aggravated at solving the same conflicts twice in every file. >>> >>> 2.6.7 is from 2012, so that's a bit newer than some of our >>> requirements, but I think not so bad. YMMV. >> >> Perhaps it is time for me to update to gmime 2.6 in this machine. PITA ;/ > > Please do, i think gmime 2.4 is really not well-supported upstream any > more either. Hmm, it seems I've been using gmime 2.6(.17 -- now updated to .20) a long time already -- just that `make distclean` does not see that and I've been looking that part in my build script... Interestingly when David's changes are pushed I have to edit the distclean part of my build to find new gmime so it can do that (distclean, that is) successfully ;) IMO it is somewhat akward that `make distclean` executes `./configure` but that is probably something no-one wants to do anything with... Tomi > > --dkg