From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE0E6DE13FB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.128 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.061, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D56nIfbdoN3Y for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F566DE0FC5 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a4so22055693wme.1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=oxa3Uu2bym82pxNxohC8RTMGgCEDTuvu+hQ2ueex0fk=; b=J5ab8DyetOeyNUne8hj4yWOx1RgHBVOK8kHVk3FwIsz8NHZQfkm6rOyE6VHoplGrOM bZ8NWyOhordT0I6dYSlZ2b0nz8XmAevFMcMx6urgShwpnr2AOxPbRYBnIKv4Z4udCGVo 5/tlNpSWgDCWj/Z+Km/KntFuC4eRVOAqnonHUjNyetE6j61jHMii1uXnBrzPvjTpbqFw ltaF6I4bxqWwL3vk45Hm5liLecKSHZMwGPqRaKKlyRIQAVnlL4HgD2/uXdQ2Ri5+nwax +h36ykNUtMz7LTSNE9Md6lBdkPa8q3BRsKYjSE5yRgN4H6bOMW99dT33NGoGrCh6MJAg ORuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=oxa3Uu2bym82pxNxohC8RTMGgCEDTuvu+hQ2ueex0fk=; b=M/A9NI1Pq1aW+Jx+lvEOmzA7RCgY1n2+CtVSYt0h1Bl8NTpb2tPXz1S/Alri0C9Q+/ YILFXqb6WOK2clrfhirumZc2Fjx7oTN+OKPGiXxaEek/UIKMB1NU4LXkFoRv+iwbySzx xq8fU2z+V7ZOvmkdeSVhsDnDzS36TfdvHZaMlGPTkBAioIYaD26AM+BN4kcn25GLSuGX SKgOxdkninFlHaqvbtk0MLogIvJN+AYM/RXB9UuOfrisWXxypAF3qkCflOuIsZRxLc6F +i1wt/8Lmd0AOOEsxY1riEdVYCxJk02sUo26graljOfwa71OtvdnWaVygEeGE97hBSyc kluA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQnXA2utyT8ettR18RdtgDPcQwMDU8MhF/qyqzotyoq4k1O9RPmQ9P7iQxp2XC32g== X-Received: by 10.28.147.72 with SMTP id v69mr23205923wmd.79.1455706515890; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az10sm882712wjc.28.2016.02.17.02.55.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 876d6d14; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:13 +0000 (UTC) To: David Bremner , "W. Trevor King" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages? In-Reply-To: <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us> <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us> <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet> From: David Edmondson Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:13 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:55:21 -0000 On Tue, Feb 16 2016, David Bremner wrote: > "W. Trevor King" writes: > >> >> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1]. Does that sound right? Or do >> folks prefer another name? >> > > I had a thought about this. The password manager "pass" uses > > pass git {push|pull} > > for git related operations. Perhaps that would make sense for us as > well? My initial reaction is that there might be many other potential interpretations of what "notmuch-git" functionality should look like (as distinct from current nmbug functionality). As you mention below, there's quite a lot of implementation in nmbug that is not simply "put some stuff in a git repository". > So initially "notmuch-git". I'm of course open to better ideas, but > especially since you pushed a bit to make the interface follow git > more closely, perhaps that's a more informative name than "dtag". It > also leaves open the possibility of stashing other metadata than tags, > should something like [1] come to pass. > > On the other hand, it's true that what we're doing is less transparent > than what pass does, which is really just pass the arguments straight > through to git. > > [1] id:1453561198-2893-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch