From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B56DE10C1 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:24:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.145 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cT2yY77NJae3 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AC556DE0B7C for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:24:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l68so26320324wml.0 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:24:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=CJd02nN0FhQTmmjYC460yrOCqixU4Fqe6nKD3sPhRS4=; b=ibLFSsG8QB4wx+ic5clnDJVqK8SaZspb9+byyIZMCuzQ+9am4flPF0fnHRJB92DtV4 Fd3/XiXhh+GemS7HQSz9I8obTYpX29xm7mugvGb6wSuulVIKWjTqghywHltfDLSg8Nf0 3ZPTjduoBPK33Tjl2pe4fr5lKSFjguzR72JeHzp3vnoPkK6A907mr9qkzXBI6m5SqmnT Lggo5MMHojVrmwn7zzxUWGRceubrsbaqKbDoCKGb0GWN9SIWZaATdqODjIAkYFGgAGd4 HGNLxgwkthOmePZ3Vin6s3t7NdL2ofqHvcCS2Ehkzah7x6zwa5IipZEcrpEumX4WEHx1 rN9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=CJd02nN0FhQTmmjYC460yrOCqixU4Fqe6nKD3sPhRS4=; b=IcwsbCLCh4yecRIkNNegzb9SLoALwFxTdpPfhEc0CPIEOMv8jUYXC2WoUENjheYvL5 75C2ZCMpzIcxjQwE7P19SC2oZQ41tfIIJfWubUCOMUMAhHR+l+g4HHha4/kYCz5FZE7N EjJ0ZsY/vrYrB4YIaV0OGSMZ4CnOZLx7vybp1TMlHRcgX6g9Muy1E7E042337YlMVfwy wIhDWGCKgSELR++cVd0cUAEGmy0AqFfj2KazYuZqsdJwUgHgXP7de+F1gtkjq5uQXlCD /XGWL18S5frY8wD1NWYzNBH4FvkoqAjahZwqYCH6xesBXEIGQtAinNUUHUkVYYy8mHYh RFvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJC44hoZlSRAcjBd5GkYUKCNQ0xiyCt2cFyIhMquPWDpyzI4/Jx+KPf4FCtf7A9xQ== X-Received: by 10.194.119.201 with SMTP id kw9mr3743558wjb.173.1457612640707; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm3269145wjb.46.2016.03.10.04.23.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a484147f; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:23:58 +0000 (UTC) To: David Bremner , Tomi Ollila , Matthew Lear Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html In-Reply-To: <87ziu67cvh.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <56DD48B3.90604@bubblegen.co.uk> <87mvqatr6y.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87h9gigfyz.fsf@bubblegen.co.uk> <87pov58b9y.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ziu67cvh.fsf@zancas.localnet> From: David Edmondson Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:23:57 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:24:07 -0000 On Thu, Mar 10 2016, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >> >> when replying from show: >> >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:37: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --decrypt --reply-to=sender id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:37: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk >> >> there's no --decrypt when from search ... and interestingly there are other >> differences, too... > > That's useful log info, thanks Tomi. With dme's series > id:1457457179-4707-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org I get the ciphertext > when replying from search-mode, which suggests there are at least two > bugs here. That's related to "notmuch reply --decrypt thread:something" I believe, which didn't seem to decrypt when I did a quick test (but I wasn't concentrating on that aspect of things).