From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071796DE17EB for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:03:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.203 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.193, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_I5zmznAd8Y for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007406DE17E1 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0713E10005A; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:02:07 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: add defsubst notmuch-address--message-insinuated In-Reply-To: <87y4gtrmdr.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <1440619626-18768-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <87y4gtrmdr.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+68~g0c35549 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:03:35 -0000 On Sun, Aug 30 2015, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > >> +(defsubst notmuch-address--message-insinuated () >> + (memq notmuch-address-message-alist-member message-completion-alist)) >> + > > Is there some advantage to defsubst other than (maybe?) performance? It > just seems like one more construct for people to get up to speed with > the codebase. No advantage. The reason for defsubst may originally be that I did it for least execution chance -- and iirc I was reading some (gnus?) code that had quite a few defsubsts which infected my coding. Now that I checked there is no (other) defsubsts code in notmuch-emacs... so that can be just be changed to `defun' to be consistent in that sense. > > d Tomi