From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C592D6DE20BE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:52:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.503 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.149, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh1O0-W-UMtJ for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:52:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50616DE20BC for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:52:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323101000DF; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:51:55 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6] support make goals after initial {'', dist, data}clean goal(s) In-Reply-To: <8760ji61ft.fsf@tethera.net> References: <8737gucmmi.fsf@tethera.net> <20170116180448.3817-1-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <8760ji61ft.fsf@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.23.5+113~gfa95df1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:52:29 -0000 On Thu, Mar 09 2017, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > >> Now make goal combinations starting with *clean goals, >> ending with *clean coals, and having non-*clean goals in between >> should work. What does not expected to work are >> non-*clean - *clean - *non-clean goal combinations. >> >> Also, if first goals are *clean goals, re-creation of Makefile.config >> is inhibited when Makefile.config exists and ./configure is newer. >> --- >> >> Now there is more probability I don't figure out anything that >> could be improved (but, if things go as usual, i know that >> tomorrow morning ;) > > Hi Tomi; > > No more improvements for this? Maybe we should call it non-RFC now? This is as good as I can make it. Yes, I think it matured beyond the RFC status so IMO it can be released for wider reviewer audience ;) Tomi > > d