From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BD76DE012F
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.177
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[AWL=-0.110, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
 autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id rEjzYVkgnW1l for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE246DE0127
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l6so175248822wml.1
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version;
 bh=b0a0OlGUCi2g6zdsBf8rUR1CBqlNXsdqUeTTKltBVC4=;
 b=L6PFyVqGIkGHU7jPF4a1XdtAQdwvkHibluGQOhQ52qY4EJInz56m2NewduS4EcoDHu
 tFEiL0FpugbJ9ujeu5/WvKwSxmD4HPcQbDhypJ2OtTKCZ9hVbx4gNgxmwJIZMbTuSy/+
 +nlpCQHk0G1Rzz0RL7IZfhU2OBWe8vGaJjO3KTeXblWlQIgu2lW7Hr+eCUHi6XBix96W
 mavpSdUAbGsxgEC2nQWcq5mf3FtHqzEUcEcEh8BpBiJ6Y2e6moFR7QUrhH4EcV3vSouM
 VEg8E2ID+w/HhNSKrzma2EZObape3kcGMlJtF1N9eHt6dCjNs4d55U20HPE3v34bMwZP
 wq2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:mime-version;
 bh=b0a0OlGUCi2g6zdsBf8rUR1CBqlNXsdqUeTTKltBVC4=;
 b=KBGtd+TUP2fqX438V/Cy8EAGuecifQi93N6Zp4uqBOPQZYinHQ5A49YAqFQxEa+qLl
 CkTZsvGihlyehnb7RVRiPEkD0IQY+YEiMJDmT50gaJgFwaDuHHjKv/Q+1O71oiDH3cjD
 Mzxe6MUl5MdJmzcTCLwo3s36lhVolVo9MMAF1AT60EW6mwixgvTKitCWB0WYNrZonhUG
 DXWNrYkQF3JUyFGM/JGSvQxB4u7O6f29WoRMV1ijQYSlN0NpP8G5D8bnrjeYbWr47Cnm
 jmHGOLBqsQ//MwfRLIZ49x+3hqf+LIYZsqYVK3aqfFNguiGTTKh9q/67HJZVQqgPeH1H
 XPHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIG3XkSwT3Ue8JmaXpKYNWzb23YpFZpbbNN97byS46a+A7xNchlWryrOlclaYyxoQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.58.77 with SMTP id h74mr22726459wma.82.1460445813920;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net
 ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm31658620wja.6.2016.04.12.00.23.32
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])
 by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a975fab3;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
 David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on
 multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil?
In-Reply-To: <87oa9fsl9i.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
References: <87lh4nm62m.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
 <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
 <8760vn7k5g.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87oa9fsl9i.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 08:23:31 +0100
Message-ID: <m260vnmgss.fsf@dme.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:23:44 -0000

On Mon, Apr 11 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2016-04-11 20:20:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> I have the feeling I don't understand the problem. I replied to your
>> message, and didn't see any extra indentation there. I thought my reply
>> to the list was test enough. So what am I missing?
>
> Aha, it is due to a setting, thanks.  it's due to
> notmuch-show-indent-multipart -- try setting it to "t" ?
>
> i find that setting useful during notmuch-show buffers, but i don't
> think it should apply when generating a reply message.

We can try binding it to nil during reply generation. Will generate
patch...